BY: MEAGHAN DALBY
I must admit, Clare Twomey’s exhibition Piece by Piece at the Gardiner is not the kind of exhibit I usually get excited about. Personally, I find a lot of "modern" art too static. However, this piece (or pieces, really) might just change my mind.
I must admit, Clare Twomey’s exhibition Piece by Piece at the Gardiner is not the kind of exhibit I usually get excited about. Personally, I find a lot of "modern" art too static. However, this piece (or pieces, really) might just change my mind.
Piece By Piece as you walk into the exhibition Photo Credit: Meaghan Dalby |
Some broken pieces on display Photo Credit: Meaghan Dalby |
What is a really cool element, though, is the inclusion of the “maker.” Once a day, an artist will come in, sit at a desk positioned at the other end of the room and make more porcelain figures which are to be added to the floor. The “maker” is part of the exhibit, also has her back to the visitor, and is not allowed to interact with anyone. Again the visitor is shut out, like we're intruding on this weird, almost mad process of creating more and more “perfect” figurines. It's delightfully insane.
I do like this installation. There is so much going on, you could talk about themes and meanings for days. What I like is that every person who comes in has a new take on it from how I've understood it. However, from a museological standpoint, it leaves something to be desired:
1. It's hella dark. The figurines are small, and it's very hard for visitors, especially elderly ones to see them. I know this is how the artist wanted it set up, which raises some questions about balancing the look and feel of an exhibition with accessibility for the visitors. I'd love to hear your opinions on this below...
2. There's next to no explanation. There is one wall panel, but it’s written in a way that is hard to understand. Most visitors ask for clarification, so I suppose that having a gallery attendant is in lieu of panels… Though I don't think that was the museum's intent.
3. People don't understand why they are shut out by the “maker” and the objects on the plinths. If they don't talk to the Gallery Attendant, or stay long enough to sort it out, it can be a very uninviting exhibition.
The "Maker's" Table Photo Credit: Meaghan Dalby |
1. It's hella dark. The figurines are small, and it's very hard for visitors, especially elderly ones to see them. I know this is how the artist wanted it set up, which raises some questions about balancing the look and feel of an exhibition with accessibility for the visitors. I'd love to hear your opinions on this below...
The "Maker's" table in the spotlight, the figures in shadows Photo Credit: Meaghan Dalby |
3. People don't understand why they are shut out by the “maker” and the objects on the plinths. If they don't talk to the Gallery Attendant, or stay long enough to sort it out, it can be a very uninviting exhibition.
Leita, one of the original figures on the plinths, with her back to us Photo Credit: Meaghan Dalby |
Overall, I really like this exhibit. I think there is so much to talk about, and some of the museological concerns I've outlined above can't be avoided. In fact, some of them lead to conversations - which I imaging is part of the artist's intent.
Has anyone else seen it? What do you think? It's entirely possible that I've been staring at the installation for too long and have over-thought the whole thing. Let me know!!
Meaghan, great analysis! I have not been yet but will try to zoom in on your suggestions while I am there and let you know how it went. I really like the idea of integrating an artist in the piece but without interpretation (any kind!) what is the visitor left to assume?
ReplyDeleteYes, it is tricky for the visitor to navigate. I'd be interested to hear what you think of it! That is the beauty (and challenge) of more modern art - is that the interpretation is left up to the visitor. But, if they're not prepped for that, it's not always a pleasant experience for them.
DeleteVery interesting to hear your take on this exhibition, Meaghan. While I also have not yet seen this exhibition, it looks totally different from the last several temporary exhibitions at the Gardiner (not to mention the setup of the permanent collection). However, I have been very impressed with these last few exhibitions at the Gardiner, and the museum's consistent (and perhaps increasing?) willingness to challenge their existing visitors and put their exhibits on an as-yet unexplored plane for this museum. I'm looking forward to seeing this one!
ReplyDelete