BY: MADELINE SMOLARZ
Last month, the museum world buzzed with anticipation. The
Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) project entitled “Of Africa” was launched with an
evening keynote speaker and five panel presentations over a two-day symposium
that took place October 23-25. 2014 marks twenty-five years since the opening
of the ROM’s controversial exhibition “Into the Heart of Africa” in November
1989. When a museum exhibition incites a negative reaction as “Into the Heart
of Africa” did, the wider community can be left with more questions than
answers, feelings of confusion and anger, and a lingering mistrust for the
museum. “Of Africa” is the ROM’s response to the events that followed the
exhibition’s opening, which included large protests and an outpouring of
emotion. Part of the “Of Africa” brochure reads:
“Of Africa interrogates monolithic representations of
Africa, collections, and colonial histories by broadening the discussion and
presentation of what constitutes Africa and African art. Our goal is to present
stories and perspectives, and introduces audiences to historical and
contemporary expressions, both cultural and artistic. Crucial to these
initiatives is the ROM’s engagement with members of the African and African
diasporic communities in Toronto and Canada… Through its various activities and
engagements, Of Africa wants to affect change in the ways Canadian audiences
view Africa and its diaspora.”
Promotional poster for “Of Africa." Source. |
The following are the personal responses of four Masters of Museum Studies (MMSt) students who attended either Day 1 (October 24) or Day 2 (October 25) of the event. It is my hope to inspire ongoing conversation amongst museum professionals and throughout the wider community about the issues that “Into the Heart of Africa” and “Of Africa” raise via the presentation of multiple perspectives. Just because the main event is over does not mean that we should stop discussing it – quite the opposite in this case.
Holly Durawa, second year MMSt
In our program, we often talk about museum exhibits that have “shaped” us or
“impacted” us. Generally in such discussions we mean “for the better.”
“Learning from Into the Heart of Africa” illuminated how exhibits
can have a detrimental effect on people’s lives and their relationship with an
institution. Panelists and audience members alike spoke passionately about how
the mishandling of the exhibit broke their trust in the ROM, creating 25 years
of anger and resentment. I am hopeful that this symposium created inroads to
begin healing those long-suffering wounds. However, based on the fact that ROM
senior managers and board members chose not to attend this panel, the sole one
to focus on their own institution, I will keep my expectations low.
Members of Panel Two “Africa and the Diaspora in Western Institutions" gathering for discussion following their presentations on Day 1. Photo Credit: Madeline Smolarz. |
Sarah Spotowski, first year MMSt
Panel One for
the “Of Africa" symposium, “Learning from Into the Heart of Africa,”
was a heartbreakingly passionate and illuminating narrative for both speakers
and audience members, most of whom were involved in the original Coalition for
the Truth about Africa (CFTA). As someone who was too young to understand
the controversial “Into the Heart of Africa" exhibition during its
time, this panel helpfully outlined the incidents. I found journalist
Geraldine Moriba’s speech to be the most captivating part of this panel, as she
provided news clippings demonstrating the media’s complicit role in
perpetuating myths about the protestors. Many of the news releases found
online or in archives portray the members of the CFTA as ignorant terrorists,
and it was necessary for Moriba to reclaim and reiterate the purpose of the
group. Panel One was the “must-see” portion of the entire symposium, as
it provided essential context for the rest of the panels.
Journalist Geraldine Moriba. Source. |
Madeline Smolarz,
first year MMSt and Musings Contributing Editor
Less than a third of the seats were taken when I entered the ROM’s Signy and Cléophée Eaton Theatre during Panel Two of Day 1. I was disappointed with the attendance, but I wondered then, and still wonder now, whether it was due to a dearth of publicity, the apprehension to reopen old wounds, or something else. The speaker that stood out for me was Ato Quayson of Panel Three, who brought a welcome approach that was relaxed but also respectful and academic. Another student had commented during a break that Panel One had been more serious and emotionally charged. However, Quayson both lightened the mood to be more optimistic overall and enlightened the audience on “Modernity and the African City,” the title and focus of his talk. He poignantly challenged a belief he feels is pervasive in our society - that impoverished African people have no dreams - by highlighting the creative energy of the continent and the potential innately within each individual.
Less than a third of the seats were taken when I entered the ROM’s Signy and Cléophée Eaton Theatre during Panel Two of Day 1. I was disappointed with the attendance, but I wondered then, and still wonder now, whether it was due to a dearth of publicity, the apprehension to reopen old wounds, or something else. The speaker that stood out for me was Ato Quayson of Panel Three, who brought a welcome approach that was relaxed but also respectful and academic. Another student had commented during a break that Panel One had been more serious and emotionally charged. However, Quayson both lightened the mood to be more optimistic overall and enlightened the audience on “Modernity and the African City,” the title and focus of his talk. He poignantly challenged a belief he feels is pervasive in our society - that impoverished African people have no dreams - by highlighting the creative energy of the continent and the potential innately within each individual.
Scholar Ato Quayson. Source. |
Rowena McGowan, first year MMSt
My experience was probably different from everyone else’s in that
I went to Day 2 of the panels, as I was really interested in the talk about the
White Saviour complex. From a purely Museum Studies scholar point of view, the
highlight was seeing Ciraj Rassool speak in person about his experiences with
museums in Cape Town. However, personally speaking, my favourite talk was
Christa Clarke’s, entitled “Collecting Beyond the Canon". In it, she discussed her
research into the donor of one of the Newark Museum of Art’s collections of
African artefacts. What I really loved was the way this narrative flipped the
whole ‘collector’ paradigm on its head. Mostly when we speak about museum
collectors, they’re white, male and upper class. Clarke’s subject was black,
female and worked as both a domestic servant and a hairdresser to pay for her
trip. It was a subversion that I found really powerful and I thoroughly enjoyed
hearing about how she had constructed her journey.
Christa Clarke of the Newark Museum of Art. Source. |
I invite anyone who attended any part of the “Of Africa" launch to comment below with reflections on their experience. Did a particular presentation speak to you or did the event as a whole leave you with a lasting impression?
For more information on "Of Africa," please visit the project's website.
A special thank you to Holly, Sarah, and Rowena for sharing their thoughts on “Of Africa" for the purposes of this article.
Madeline, thank you for a thoughtful introduction and a great round-up of perspectives for those of us who were not able to attend "Of Africa."
ReplyDeleteBased on your experience and the materials provided at the event, did the ROM indicate explicitly how they would continue this conversation beyond the weekend's symposium? I've noted the current exhibition "Maps, Borders & Mobility In Africa," though I found it excessively difficult to navigate to its page on the ROM website (there appears to be little internal linking to this page). Given this difficulty and the "dearth of publicity" mentioned above, do you think that the ROM's efforts will be publicized enough to make a significant impact in and outside of the museum community?
I am glad to hear that you found the article helpful, Katherine.
ReplyDeleteThe first paragraph of the brochure provided to attendees of the symposium states that "Of Africa" is "a three year multi-disciplinary program" and that it will feature (the following was presented as a bulleted list) "lectures, live performances, exhibits, workshops, film screenings, residencies, educational programs, selected partnerships with other cultural institutions." The brochure accompanied information on ROM membership, "ROM Speaks" (a new speaker series), and a booklet of biographies of the speakers who presented at "Of Africa" on Day 1 and Day 2, all of which were distributed together in pre-assembled folders. Outside of this package and the website, I have not found more details on how "Of Africa" will proceed.
I believe that if the ROM does not improve its efforts to publicize "Of Africa" and the accessibility of the project's website, it will fail to have the impact it has the potential to have. In addition, Holly noted that senior ROM staff did not attend the event and others have echoed this observation online. If the very people who run the ROM are not seen to stand behind "Of Africa," what message does this send the community?