Showing posts with label iSchool. Show all posts
Showing posts with label iSchool. Show all posts

21 March 2020

MUSEUM DETOX PANEL REVIEW: ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN THE MUSEUM

Weekend Edition | Madison Carmichael & Jaime Meier


The Master of Museum Studies program (MMSt) is overwhelmingly white. This is true whether you’re looking at the students or the syllabuses. We talk about diversity and race in the context of museums often, but not so often do we remark upon the privileged position from which many of us speak, nor the privileged position from which many of us will operate once we move into our careers.

Museum Professionals of Colour (MPOC) was originally a support group for students of colour to talk about being in an all-white program. It started out with about six or seven Indigenous, Black, and People of Colour (IBPOC) who were excited to finally be open about their feelings of underrepresentation and isolation. Upon learning that the MMSt program previously had a diversity group that had dissolved, MPOC decided to become an official student organization to provide a permanent collective for future generations. They are driven by their desire to support People of Colour (POC) within the MMSt program and help facilitate conversations about race with their peers and the wider museum community. MPOC have used multiple platforms to achieve their goal, including social media (InstagramFacebook), online publications, and most recently a panel featuring Wendy Ng, Manager of School Programs at the Ontario Science CentreJ’net Ayay Qwa Yak Sheelth, Indigenous Outreach and Learning Coordinator at the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM); and Just John Samuels, Art Curator and Community Organizer at Blank Canvas Gallery

From left to right: Denise Tenio, Megan Sue-Chue-Lam, Wendy Ng, J'net Ayay Qwa Yak Sheelth, Just John Samuels, Dominica Tang, and Chloé Houde. Photo courtesy of Jaime Meier. 
The panel, “Museum Detox: Cleansing Institutions of Unconscious Bias and Developing Anti-Racist Praxis,” was developed by MPOC in partnership with MUSSA. Guided by questions from members of MPOC, panelists discussed the emergent trend of diversity work in cultural institutions and how museums might break that trend-cycle to do “diversity right,” speaking to institutional examples or projects as well as the unexpected and very real challenges in doing this important work. Race is, according to panelist Wendy Ng, a pivotal factor in oppression, and it is critical to recognize the role that race plays in intersectional museum work as well as the oppression that one may experience within these institutions. 

These discussions led us to the idea of risk. Risk and risk-taking is embodied in the work that the panelists and MPOC themselves engage in everyday to decolonize cultural institutions and support their communities in the face of systematic oppression. While various groups work to assist in these efforts, it is critical that we consider and reflect upon how risk differs depending on who undertakes it. 

From left to right: Wendy Ng, J'net Ayay Qwa Yak Sheelth, & Just John Samuels. Photo courtesy of Jaime Meier. 
As panelist J’net Ayay Qwa Yak Sheelth so aptly put it, museums are rooted in systems of white supremacy and the systems that abet it. They are rife with binaries of us and them – or else us vs. them – which is only compounded by the strict hierarchies of power, position, and knowledge hammered into their foundations. And the “us,” those who occupy the highest positions of power, are – much like our program – overwhelmingly white, and so the systems in place actively advantage white folks and disadvantage others. As such, what constitutes risk and what is at stake in taking a risk looks markedly different within a system like that. 

It is not and cannot be up to POC alone to address all institutional issues themselves. White people and allies have an important role to play in challenging institutions that uphold white supremacy, that stem from colonial roots, and to recognize those histories and structures so as to confront them in real terms and meaningful action. MPOC have played a crucial role in beginning this work in the faculty, inspiring peers and others in the museum field to do the same. The panelists brought attention to the fact that we exist in a culture of whiteness that requires us to decenter ourselves in regards to power, culture, and relationships. A starting point for allies and white people is to ask important questions about our relationship to hierarchies and privilege. This may include:
  • What privilege do you have?
  • Who’s missing from the conversation? Who are you talking to?
  • How can we create equilibrium in our (museum) spaces?
  • Who are events for? Is it a performance for non-racialized folks? 
  • What risks are you willing to take? How will you leverage your power to enact change and challenge oppressive structures?

Faculty and students alike consider issues of  doing "diversity right," confronting institutional systems of white supremacy, and the important work that allies can engage in to help with these efforts. Photo courtesy of Jaime Meier. 
Once allies and white people occupying museum spaces begin to consider these things, important work can begin to take place. This does not mean turning to POC exclusively for guidance and support; white people and allies must shoulder the responsibility of educating themselves and talking to other white people and allies about issues that POC face, even when they are not in the room. MPOC have also stressed the importance of allies speaking up in difficult situations and to take the initiative to ask questions and challenge statements. It is a moment of fleeting discomfort as opposed to the compounded lifetime of negative experiences felt by POC, which only increases feelings of isolation. In the words of Wendy Ng, white people need to be willing to sacrifice their comfort, and at times more, in order to be an ally. 

“Museum Detox” was, in the words of MPOC, a single step towards developing anti-racist practice within cultural institutions but not a small or unimportant one. As Just John Samuels so wonderfully put it, we’re in such a beautiful position to begin this work in earnest. Whether as museum professionals or as students of museum studies, we have the power to enact change and pose challenges. And so we must agree with Just John: that position is indeed a beautiful place in which to work. 

And, of course, if you're interested in listening to the panel yourself, please check out the livestream here!

14 October 2019

REACHING OUT; REACHING IN: ALUMNI CHECK-IN


Alumni Check-In | Elizabeth Cytko


University College and King's Circle. Photo courtesy of Elizabeth Cytko


As a new museum studies student, starting this degree can be overwhelming. A few of the things occupying your time include: learning all the theory, discovering free food events, project management, the names of your cohort and participating in extracurricular activities (and yes I am going to pretend riding the TTC counts as extracurricular.)

One of the first things you learn is that there are a lot more jobs in the museum industry than is “advertised” in popular culture. So many jobs, so little time, and how do you even begin to discover the pros and cons of each one?!

Being a student gives you a secret super power, which I suggest you use – Student Status.



 Professional interviews are one of the best ways to make connections, make new friends, and discover potential paths for your career. Student status means having an excuse as to why you want to reach out to professionals in the field, and ask them what their job is about.

I know this from personal experience. For the past 9 months I have had the privilege to interview alumni from the Museum Studies program. This means I reached out to persons (who often I had never met before!) to ask them what life is like after graduation. The alumni have been friendly, gracious, and eager to share their experience.

Human impact on environment comes in all sorts of forms. Museum preservation is beyond objects, and includes complicated discussions. For example, how could a museum professional raise awareness for the need to preserve native prairie landscapes? Canola Field, Alberta. Photo courtesy of Elizabeth Cytko


Initially, what I had felt to be rather scary and intimidating has turned into a column I look forward to initiating. Who can I ask next? What exciting things are happening out in the field? Even though these alumni are across the continent and working in different museums, many of their concerns are shared. Through interviews, themes such as the environment, decolonization and technology are all repeated again and again. My eyes have been opened to the fact that the museum community is tight knit and comes together to work on some of the most complicated issues.

Some of the alumni have even thrown down challenges for the museum professionals (new and old) to tackle.

Kate Wolforth asks us to consider the waste of exhibitions, and what happens to the signage, packaging, and materials used afterwards. Is it justifiable that so much ends up in the dump?

Roderick MacLean asks how historic sites (and museums in general) can adapt to the longer visitor seasons due to global warming. Will it be the new trend to hire past the Summer season, into the Fall?

And Deborah Robichaud tasks new professionals to incorporate environmental scans into their daily practice, and ask “What are the big issues in the world and how do they affect museums?”

I am excited to present you the new interviews in this upcoming semester, and I hope that you too are inspired to reach out to the alumni network. Remember, in a few short years, you will be an alumnus, and a nervous student might reach out to you!


If you want to reach out to me, feel free to!

elizabeth.cytko@mail.utoronto.ca


7 October 2019

REUNITING WITH RISK: A DAY AT THE MMST50 UNCONFERENCE



In 1969, a small group of students gathered in the Royal Ontario Museum as part of a new program offered by the University of Toronto. The program itself was named Museum Studies, and it sought to prepare a new generation of museologists through direct, hands-on training in a cultural institution. Little did they know that 50 years later, this small, specialized program would grow into a thriving community of alumni that stretches across the globe.


The Official Logo of the MMSt50 Conference

Last week, the Museum Studies program celebrated its 50th anniversary in the Claude T. Bissel building, which has housed the program since the year 2006. Students and professionals of all ages were invited to engage with one another in a series of workshops and discussions in the Inforum. 

Although everyone was happy to be in such an enthusiastic group, the conference was not fluffy or wistful. Rather than simply using this occasion as a platform for blind optimism, the MMSt50 committee – led by alumni Melissa Smith – chose to center this special day around the topic of risk. More specifically, the event attempted to shed light on how museums can become more open to risk, and how we as museum professionals can create environments where risk is encouraged.


Faculty Dean Wendy Duff addresses the crowd at the beginning of the Unconference.
Photograph courtesy of Jordan Fee.

To begin the day, participants engaged in a series of discussions about the definition of risk, which was followed by a rapid-fire series of discussions, each of which were led by a specific museum professional. These facilitators came from a wide variety of backgrounds, from historic houses, to municipal government, to the world of business and marketing. Cheryl Blackman, Director of Museum and Heritage Services for the City of Toronto, brought some incredible energy to these discussions, encouraging all of the participants to surround themselves with people who they can trust. It seems like taking risks becomes much easier when you can rely on your team for advice, support and hard work.

There were also commentators who chose to speak about risks not only facing museums, but also the human population at large. The MMSt50 celebration took place on the same day as the Global Climate strike, which saw an unbelievable turnout in Toronto. Doug Worts, who bills himself as a Culture and Sustainability Expert, took to the floor to ask pressing questions, such as “What cultural impacts are museums trying to achieve?” and “How might we change our actions to make a greater impact outside of our institutions?” 


A group of students, alumni and faculty members discuss risk at the roundtable.
Photograph courtesy of Jordan Fee.

As the day went on, more and more people got in touch with one another, and became more comfortable with bringing new ideas to the table. A group exercise led by Cara Krmpotich,  Director of the Museum Studies program, asked the group to make commitments about the kinds of risks that they would take after returning to their respective places of work. More importantly, this exercise asked other people in the room to commit their own time and resources to helping others in the room to take risks. This led to an extensive conversation about precarious work in museums, support groups and professional development events. There was an exciting energy pulsating in this room, and it was quite apparent that new bonds were being formed as we spoke. 

To cap off this exciting day, Katherine Ott, curator at the National Museum of American History, gave an incredible talk about risk, inclusion, power and memory in museums. Some of the most impactful statements made by Ott were related to museums as places of healing, therapy and wellbeing for those who have experienced past traumas. 


Katherine Ott at the Royal Ontario.
Photograph courtesy of Jordan Fee.

In keeping with the theme of risk, Ott was careful not to spare words about the brutal nature of the world today. The lecture was inspiring in a way that few others can be. In the end, this talk reminded us that we are all much more powerful when we support one another, and that we can make a difference if we pool our resources. In the words of Katherine Ott: “Just be your beautiful selves! We’re all in this together.”

11 March 2018

MMSt 2018: THESIS PROJECTS

RESEARCH COLUMN

BY: SERENA YPELAAR

Hello Musings readers! This special post is the first in a series of installments featuring the work of the MMSt Class of 2018. This weekend, we're catching up with our brilliant thesis students to see what research they've been working on for their degree. Read on below to hear about their projects!

The​ ​Future​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Past:​ ​Third-Party​ ​Heritage​ ​Preservation​ ​Interventions​ ​and 3D​ ​Printing Technologies
Sydney Stewart Rose

Supervisor: Dr. Cara Krmpotich
Second reader: Dr. Seamus Ross, former Dean of the iSchool

Dry-dusting at work, where I specialize in intellectual property rights and copyright laws (a key aspect of my thesis research). Photo courtesy of Sydney Stewart Rose.
My project examines the use of 3D printing technologies in projects which seek to recreate cultural property destroyed in Syria by ISIS. I was really interested in thinking about the ways these types of projects may create new heritage narratives or potentially contribute to colonizing narratives. I’ve been looking at three high profile cases which use 3D printing technologies to restore cultural property destroyed by ISIS. I’m using them to create a framework to consider how these types of projects may actually contribute to colonizing narratives and offer insight into a decolonizing approach to third-party heritage intervention projects.


Close to Home: Alberta’s Local Museums on Canada’s Cultural Landscape
Kristen McLaughlin 

Supervisor: Dr. Cara Krmpotich
Second reader: Siobhan Stevenson 

I don't really have any photos of myself at work, but for my research I visited each museum, camping along the way to get a better feel for the local landscape. However, as you can see, that meant I didn't really look very glamorous for a few months. Here I am in my first campsite in the Crowsnest Pass in the Rockies of Southern Alberta, with a bit of a smoky background from all the surrounding forest fires of 2017. Photo courtesy of Kristen McLaughlin.
For the past year and a half, I’ve studied the community engagement practices of local museums, using three case studies in Alberta to better understand these distinct contexts. I’m interested in this aspect of museum studies because, as someone who did not grow up with the large urban institutions we are familiar with in this program, I noticed that local museums stories are not common in museum studies literature and work. I felt that it was important to acknowledge and try to understand the relationships between local museums and their communities—both the obstacles and the successes—and what this might mean on a larger scale.

Research possible thanks to the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the Alberta Historical Resources Foundation.


Affective Metadata for Object Experiences in the Art Museum
Erin Canning

Supervisor: Dr. Costis Dallas
Second reader: Dr. Cara Krmpotich

Affective metadata workshop at the 2018 iSchool Student Conference. Photo courtesy of Hannah Monkman.
For my thesis, I am exploring how to structure information about visitor experiences so that we can document it similar to how we catalogue objects – how that information can be made amenable to integration into a database, what that database would look like, and what that information would look like once it was in there. I am interested in the affective experiences that museum visitors have with artworks, and using data modeling as a way to really understand those experiences. My thesis draws together my experience as a CRO: I am applying the information systems design principles from my MI degree in the museum domain. 

_____

I'm in awe of these three talented MMSt/CRO students and their dedication to such extensive and important research. Excellent job Sydney, Kristen, and Erin - thank you for sharing!

Stay tuned for next weekend's article, where we'll feature the first batch of exhibition projects in the MMSt Class of 2018! 

16 November 2017

HIGH FASHION HIJAB - AND MUSLIM WOMAN'S PLACE IN THE FASHION WORLD

SEW WHAT

BY: JESSICA SVENNINGSON

High fashion has increasingly been finding its way into cultural institutions – like the ROM’s new exhibition exploring Dior in the 20th century, MoMA’s current exhibition Items: Is Fashion Modern?, and a yet-to-be-announced exhibition at the Bata Shoe Museum showcasing a designer’s collection of footwear, set to open in 2018. The strong political voice museums hold has great power to legitimize art and cultural activities, and their corresponding objects. This voice has recently spoken up in the fashion and political debates surrounding Muslim women’s fashion, more specifically hijabs.

High Fashion Hijab Queen. Source

Hijabs have been thrown under both critical and supportive media spotlights in the context of recent political turmoil in North America and abroad. Ibtihaj Muhammad competed in the 2016 summer Olympics in her hijab, Dolce and Gabbana and launched high fashion hijabs, and Halima Aden, a Somali-American, competed in Miss Minnesota USA wearing a hijab and burkini. Considering the recent backlash from American museums in the face of an Islamophobic Twitter-troll, the time is ripe to host exhibitions exploring Islamic fashion and the politics contained within it. San Francisco's de Young Museum will be hosting The Fashion of Islam, opening fall 2018, to demonstrate the complexity and variety of Islamic fashions from around the world. To quote the director, Max Hollein, 

Dolce & Gabanna, 2016. Source

"There are probably people who don't even think there is fashion in Islam. But if you look at Saudi Arabia, Dubai, and Beirut, the fashion is really vibrant, and it can speak to larger political and social developments, cultural understanding, and misunderstandings."
Hollein is hot on the heels of Australia’s Museum of Applied Arts & Science’s exhibition Faith, Fashion, Fusion: Muslim Women’s Style in Australia, currently on display at the Islamic Art Museum of Malaysia, showing the diversity in Australian Islamic fashion through photographs, garments, and interviews.
Uniqlo + Hana Tajima, 2017. Source
The presentation of these exhibitions is in direct opposition to arguments made by French women's rights and families minister Laurence Rossignol, and Yves Saint Laurent's co-founder Pierre Bergé, who both view the hijab as a form of "slavery". Berge's attitude is in reflection of a new trend in fashion for 'modest wear', clothing lines designed for Islamic women who wish to dress conservatively, and fashionably. This attitude for exclusion from an international fashion company seems short-sighted considered the massive buying power the Islamic world holds, with spending projections for the fashion industry in the Arab world expecting to reach $484 billion by 2019. Ignoring that kind of potential for growth sends a strong message of how unimportant Euro-American fashion industries view the Islamic world as a viable market.

The fashion-political opinions against Western fashion industries catering to the social needs of Muslim women is grounded in a “colonial feminist” attitude that we need to teach others how to live. This attitude, “reduce[‘s] the diverse situations and attitudes of millions of Muslim women to a single item of clothing,” without considering the opportunity for self-expression possible within the hijab itself. To no surprise, the debate over the hijab is really another debate over women’s bodies, and their agency over it. Using fashion as a tool to exercise that control, Dolce and Gabanna, Uniqlo, and Nike have launched products and clothing lines that not only give Muslim women the ability to exercise that agency over their own body, but to engage in all activities as other women do.

However, this shift in the western fashion markets catering to fashion desires of Muslim women fans the flames of a fundamental paradigm struggle currently happening in the Muslim countries all around the world. Shelina Janmohamed, author of Love In A Headscarf, describes this tension:

“Today's fashion industry is about consumerism and objectification - buy, buy, buy and be judged by what you wear. Muslim fashion is teetering between asserting a Muslim woman's right to be beautiful and well-turned out, and buying more stuff than you need, and being judged by your clothes - both of which are the opposite of Islamic values. Modesty isn't just how you look, it's what you purchase and what you waste....it might be liberating for the Muslim women purchasing these fashions on the high street, but how liberating is it for the Muslim women who made them in the sweatshops in Bangladesh and elsewhere?"
Nike Muslim women's sportswear, 2018. Source
Turning to third-year Social Anthropology student at SOAS (the School of Oriental and African Studies in London) Sabah Haneen Choudhry, she asks,
“Why is the hijab ‘acceptable’ only when it's appropriated and managed by major [Western] corporations? ... Why can't Muslim women decide the parameters of their Islamic identity and sexual morality, without facing harsh scrutiny from within and outside the 'imagined' Muslim community?"
"Legitimizing" hijabs in the Western world by western high fashion companies not only looks badly on the companies who expand their markets with the intention of monetary gain, but it also reflects badly on western museums who only now are exploring Muslim fashion. It should not have taken a high fashion Italian clothing designer and several other internationally known clothing companies to motivate western museums into exploring fashion from the Islamic world. It begs the question: what other contemporary cultures are being under-represented in museums globally, and what can be done to present these cultures without exorcising them? As gatekeepers, caregivers, and presenters of arts and culture, museums have a responsibility to provide equal opportunity to represent all angles of cultural identity.