Showing posts with label Europeana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Europeana. Show all posts

29 June 2020

JUST HORSING AROUND: "THE COLOSSUS OF LEONARDO DA VINCI" COURTESY OF EUROPEANA

Exhibition Reviews | Madison Carmichael


I don’t know about you, but an unfinished project haunts me like little else. One has to wonder if Leonardo da Vinci felt the same about his never-completed equestrian monument of Francesco Sforza. Luckily for us, the reams of notes and drawings of said monument remain, preserved by the National Library of Spain, so a virtual reconstruction of Leonardo’s design and casting process is now possible. The story of the unfinished equestrian bronze comprises “The Colossus of Leonardo da Vinci,” a special online exhibition produced by Europeana, in collaboration with the National Library of Spain and the Museo Galileo

Armed with Leonardo’s original notes and drawings, experts from Florence’s Museo Galileo sought to marry his original manuscripts to new digital reconstructions so as to finally build the bronze that was never built – or else to bring it to life as best they could, with the technology available to us now. 

The title page of the online exhibition. This functions largely like the introductory panel, but it also gives a sneak peek at one of Leonardo's designs. (Source)
Much like I mentioned last month, online and digital exhibitions ask that you create your own atmosphere. While my current residence is not nearly as chaotic as it was, I once again headed over to YouTube to see what I could find in terms of ambiance and soundscapes (here are a few). 

“The Colossus of Leonardo da Vinci” has seven chapters: the protagonists, two concepts for the statue, an innovative moulding process, a multi-furnace foundry, two different casting methods, the project is abandoned, and modern evocations. This chaptered approach guides you through Leonardo’s design and engineering process, the events that led to the project’s abandonment (an invasion, which necessitated that the bronze set aside for the monument be used to cast artillery instead, followed by an occupation and subsequent fall of the Sforzas), and modern evocations of the monument.

A portrait of Galeazzo Maria Sforza found within the exhibition. He was the original patron of the project. (Source)
In its structure, “The Colossus of Leonardo da Vinci” straddles the past and the present. The exhibition begins in the late 1400s, when the Duke of Milan, Galeazzo Maria Sforza, conceived of an equestrian monument to celebrate his dynasty. The project was propelled by his successor, and when Leonardo received the commission for this project, he proceeded to absolutely run away with it. In perhaps a characteristic move, Leonardo transformed the commission into an “epic undertaking,” one that was entirely unheard of in both the history of art and in the scope of casting methods, as he set out to produce this enormous, equestrian monument – I say enormous, because this monument would require more than sixty tons of bronze and would stand over seven metres tall – in a single cast. 

From here, the exhibition moves through the two concept designs for the monument – a rider on a prancing horse vs. a walking horse – the moulding process, which was enormously complex, the foundry Leonardo envisioned for the casting process, and two different casting processes that he considered.

This 3D reconstruction renders the vertical foundry system which comprised of one of Leonardo's concepts for casting. It was done by Andrea Bernadoni and Riccardo Braga of the Museo Galileo. (Source)

This image depict the original drawings as done by Leonardo, conceptualizing a foundry to cast the horse. Compare it to the 3D rendering above! (Source)
This exhibition takes an enormously interdisciplinary approach to one, unfinished project of Leonardo da Vinci’s. It is at times historical, or art historical, and at others it is deeply technical, drawing on technological design and renderings. As someone deeply interested in the historical contexts of most things, I found it fascinating to peer into this specific moment in time, and the events surrounding it, and to learn through Leonardo’s notes and drawings more about the technology of the 1400s and about how, even hypothetically, a monument may have been cast at this point in time. 

As mentioned, what’s interesting about this exhibition is how it ties the historical to the present – how it straddles the past and the present. This is most evident in the images interspersed throughout. In the chapters detailing the design and engineering process, modern 3D reconstructions are displayed alongside the historical equivalents done by Leonardo. It is in this way that this exhibition endeavors to bring this unfinished monument to life, using the tools we now have in concert with the plans Leonardo left behind.

Two modern evocations of this very project exist worldwide! (Source)
The exhibition closes with two modern evocations, or realizations, of Leonardo’s unfinished monument. One was completed under the direction of Hidemichi Tanaka, which was unveiled in 1989 in Nagoya City, Japan. The other was completed by American artist Nina Akamu, which was inaugurated in Milan in 1999, and it can still be found in front of the hippodrome of San Siro. 

There’s something poetic in that, I think. While neither of these modern projects were developed using the casting techniques that Leonardo penned just about five hundred years ago, they were both completed regardless. Add to that the 3D reconstructions completed by the Museo Galileo that do portray his techniques, it makes me feel like his unfinished monument has been finished, in a way. 

After all, a bronze, equestrian monument does stand in Milan, at what was ostensibly the planned site of Leonardo’s original horse. So, perhaps we have indeed brought this unfinished project to life, as best as we are able. 

24 October 2019

OPEN UP: ACCESS, EXPERIENCE, & PARTICIPATION IN THE GLAM SECTOR


GLAM Guide | Madison Carmichael


In his presentation at re:publica 2019, the thirteenth edition of that conference, Douglas McCarthy centered his keynote talk around the following quote from the American judge and legal philosopher Learned Hand

“The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right...it seeks to understand the minds of other men and women.” (Learned Hand, 1872-1961)

He tells us that in this quote is a humility that he would like to see more of in the museum sector, though I’d argue that it’s applicable to the GLAM sector writ large. Certainly, there is a beautiful sort of freedom in the admittance of I don’t know. When we don’t know something, we reach out. We ask questions. And when others answer, hopefully we listen. 

McCarthy goes on to say that museums should embrace “a confident but unsure listening mode.” The time is past for top-down dictation to the public. There’s been a shift in how people interact with GLAM content and with the institutions themselves, so we’re faced with a more participatory reality, and the challenge for the GLAM sector, McCarthy says, lies in embracing it.  

So, it’s time for the GLAM sector to open up. Or, to continue opening up. This includes both opening the GLAM mindset to experiences that are immersive and innovative and opening the sector’s extensive collections to the public. It means re-establishing GLAM institutions as places for community. 

I’ll admit that this is a very lofty assertion. But it is a worthwhile one, and it’s not as though we’re starting from scratch. In the GLAM sector, several institutions have already begun to embrace a more accessible, experiential, and participatory approach to their work. 

Through the Rijksstudio, the Rijksmuseum has allowed for much of their collection to be viewed by the public. Source.

Perhaps the most well-known and widespread trend in the GLAM sector is growing access to the full collection of an institution through digitization. These collections are available in their entirety, rather than as curated exhibits. The Rijksstudio, a project from the Rijksmuseum, takes this a step further. By allowing visitors to create their own “studio,” or collection of artworks and objects, the Rijksstudio makes apparent the stories that each and every visitor uncovers within the collection. Flowers, fancy headgear, animals and more – studios created by users reveals the multitude of stories hidden within the collection that are yet to be told. 

With less than 5% of the collection shown in the museum, the SFMOMA decided that the best way to show off their artwork was to bring it out from the museum. Source.

In the same vein, GLAM institutions are changing how they display their collections physically. For museums like the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, an institution that displays less than 5% of their collection within the actual museum, physical display isn’t enough. In June 2017, SFMOMA launched “Send me SFMOMA,” a digital initiative wherein a person would text a number, with a keyword, colour, or emoji, and the SFMOMA would send them a related artwork by text. The aim was to show more of SFMOMA’s collection with people across the United States, and through this service, people could personalize what artwork they received. The response was overwhelming; by the end of July 2017, SFMOMA had received over 3.7 million text requests. Many, many people invited art and culture into their daily lives, and they didn’t have to visit the museum to do it.  

More than just their collections, GLAM institutions have also begun to digitize exhibits, opening up their content and stories to audiences beyond their buildings. The Warsaw Rising Museum exhibits decades of Polish history online. Source

Part of that “listening mode” I mentioned earlier is learning where people are at. For some, that is not within a GLAM institution, for a multitude of reasons. As with moving collections online, many institutions have begun to move visitor experiences beyond their walls as well. SFMOMA did so through a digital service, bringing a personally curated art experience to people across the United States. The Warsaw Rising Museum  delivered an entire exhibit through a website. “Warsaw Rising” depicts the history of Warsaw from 1918 onward. The focus is, of course, is the Warsaw Rising, but there is certainly a thematic emphasis on Warsaw as a dynamic, developing city, despite its hardships. It is a fully interactive exhibit with compelling text, audio, and visuals – it is indeed an entire exhibit online. 

Europeana provides access for 50 million digitized items from many European institutions. Source.

I want to close by returning to Douglas McCarthy for a moment. As Collections Manager for Europeana Collections, McCarthy is part of an organization that works with thousands of European archives, libraries, and museums to share cultural heritage with the aim of making it easier to use, whether that be for work, learning, or fun. This approach is useful, I think, for the GLAM sector wholesale; in working to make cultural heritage easier to use, access, and explore, we make it accessible to a wider public, thereby opening up our institutions to a greater world of possibility.