Showing posts with label Glenbow Museum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Glenbow Museum. Show all posts

5 March 2020

LOOKING FROM BEHIND THE GLASS: CHALLENGES WITH DISPLAYING FASHION

Sew What | Natalie Heaton
The trend to display fashion and textiles is becoming increasingly popular in museums. Curators often run into issues when it comes to displaying garments, like many objects within institutions.  For decades, fashion exhibits were struggling to be accepted because they were not seen as "real art" because it was controlled by the female sector. This article will dive into these challenges and try to understand how these challenges came to be.

Christian Dior Exhibition, Glenbow Museum, June 2019
Photo Courtesy of Natalie Heaton
The National Scottish Museum, May 2019
Photo Courtesy of Natalie Heaton
One of the largest obstacles that institutions face that the guests are unable to touch the garments. When it comes to clothing, the main sense that guests use is touch as it is what is familiar to them. Most museums do not allow the guest to touch the artefacts and more often than not, the garments are kept in glass cases while on display to protect and ensure its longevity. An example of a museum that does this is The National Scottish Museum in Edinburgh. This institution keeps all its garments in glass cases while on the floor. Since guests are not able to handle the clothing, the curator of the exhibition must find a creative way to solve this problem.

An additional obstacle that fashion and textile exhibitions often encounter, despite curator’s best efforts, is the affiliation with shopping or consumerism. Often, guests will associate what is in an exhibition to what is familiar in their lives. In this case, the guest will be related to one’s personal experiences of shopping or the clothing that they are wearing. This may be a strength because the institution does not have to contextualize the item, but with that being said, the museum may struggle to make the guest understand the object in a different way; to understand it as a form art.

Christian Dior Exhibition, Glenbow Museum, June 2019
Photo Courtesy of Natalie Heaton



This struggle with guests understanding fashion and textile as a form of art is nothing new. In fact, this has been a struggle for as long as museums have been around. “The European 19th century’s male-centric curatorial view understood fashion as a form of feminine folly.” This legacy has continued to be associated with fashion and textile exhibitions within the museum setting. Critics of these exhibitions continually undermine these exhibitions as they view them as a highly feminine, and just a way to keep the institution trendy, but never as art.


However, there has been a shift in recent years within fashion exhibitions to look at the construction of the clothing instead of just the garment. Through this shift, fashion is being considered as an art form based on the construction that goes into the different aspects of a garment. An example of this would be Iris Van Herpen: Transforming Fashion at the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) in 2018. The exhibition focused on the creation of Van Herpen’s extravagant dresses, with videos, images and didactic stations. The emphasis on craftsmanship and the creation of Van Herpen’s garments is an example of how fashion is considered a form of art.

Iris Van Herpen: Transforming Fashion, ROM, October 2018.
Photo Courtesy of Natalie Heaton
Overall, fashion and textile exhibitions continue to evolve with the times. While, there continues to be a struggle for these exhibitions to be taken seriously and viewed as a form of art, they remain some of my favourite exhibits to visit.

7 February 2020

ALEX JANVIER: INDIGENOUS ICON

Walk of Fame Martin Bierens


Lately, I have started to feel homesick. These nostalgic yearnings for home led me to the topic of my first article, and the revival of the Walk of Fame column. I figured I would take a look at the life and work of a personal favourite of mine, prolific Indigenous and Albertan artist Alex Janvier. Before I dive into the article, I think it is important that I acknowledge that I am not Indigenous, and am an outsider in this community, however as an outsider I believe that it is important to celebrate the contributions of Indigenous people to Canadian history.

Alex Janvier: Indigenous Artist and Alberta Source

Janvier, born in 1935 on the Treaty 6 territory of the Le Goff Reserve, Cold Lake First Nations in Northern Alberta. He is of Dene Suline and Saulteaux descent. When Janvier was eight years old he was sent to Blue Quills Indian Residential School near St. Paul, Alberta. Perhaps this next statement is obvious, but Janvier’s time at Blue Quills was a dark period in his life. During and interview with Ottawa Morning host Hallie Cotnam in 2017, Janvier spoke frankly about his time there, “I was in fear. I became scared of everything, because I didn’t understand what was happening to me. They stripped you completely threw you in a public shower, and they cut your hair bald.”

Despite the horror that Janvier experienced at Blue Quills, this led him to the discovery of his artistic talent. He was able to use it as a form of escapism from the realities of the Residential School system.
“I found a certain time of the week, you could escape from the whole outlay of controls. And for about three hours, you’re in your own world, and that’s when I began to discover my ability to work on paper and the beautiful colours – all kinds of colours.”
After leaving Blue Quills, Janvier wished to the Ontario College of Art and Design in Toronto in order to pursue his art. His plan was quickly dashed by an Indian agent who refused to allow him to travel to Ontario. Thus, Janvier enrolled in the Alberta College of Art and Design (ACAD) in Calgary.

Janvier at work. Source

Janvier began to make a name for himself in the Indigenous art community. This position was bolstered when Janvier was commissioned by the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs for eighty paintings to be included in the Canada Pavilion at Expo 67. Here he helped bring together other Indigenous artists to form the “Indian Group of Seven.

Recently, a defining moment of Janvier’s career came in 2015, when the National Gallery of Canada opened a retrospective exhibition tracing the entirety of his career, Alex Janvier: Modern Indigenous Master. This exhibition traveled to multiple institutions across Canada, including the Glenbow Museum in Calgary in 2018, were I was able to see it and begin my love affair with his work.

One of the central pieces to Janvier’s exhibition at the Glenbow was a piece entitled Lubicon, which he created in 1988 as a response to the Lubicon Cree’s protests, of the Glenbow Museum’s exhibition The Spirit Sings (1988). There is significance in the fact that this piece was exhibited at the Glenbow, it can be viewed as symbolic victory, and a representation of the path of change museums have taken in the last 30 years.

In a sense the narrative of Lubicon can be seen as a metaphor for Janvier’s career. At the beginning of Janvier’s career he constantly had to fight for his right to exist as an artist. However, Janvier has survived these difficulties and become one of the most influential Indigenous artists in Canada, and worldwide.

Alex Janvier currently runs the Janvier Gallery with the help of his family in Cold Lake, Alberta.

Tsą tsą ke k’e (Iron Foot Place) in Rogers Place, Edmonton Alberta. Source
Before I leave you, I just want to tell you all about my personal favourite artwork of Alex Janvier’s is a public art installation in the new Rogers Place arena in Edmonton, the home of the Edmonton Oilers. The work, titled Tsą tsą ke k’e (Iron Foot Place) is a massive 45-foot diameter circular mosaic that welcomes visitors into the arena.

Next time you find yourself in a gallery be sure to keep an eye out for his work, you will be able to tell by looking for his iconic flowing lines, patterns, and vibrant colours.

15 July 2019

THE REMBRANDT RULE AND REPRESENTATION IN MUSEUMS


Breaking the Glass Case | Alexandra Forand


“Treat every object as if it were a Rembrandt.” This good intentioned notion has become appropriately dubbed the Rembrandt Rule. This simple idea has been internalized in the psyche of museum professionals for decades and caused a lot of tension and heartache. This rule isn’t inherently bad, in fact it is what museums have built themselves around, because we want to keep objects for future generations to enjoy. This is the very reason we have departments like collection management and conservation.

An Actual Rembrandt painting of Rembrandt. Source.

Recently, this idea has come under fire, with some scholars (and insurance agents) pointing out not every artifact IS a Rembrandt. There are certain objects a collections manager is going to try and grab in a fire before evacuating the building. Even the most stringent conservator would agree that there is an unofficial object hierarchy in the museum, yet nobody talks about it.

Not only is the Rembrandt Rule unfeasible for many different reasons, I argue it dangerous and destructive for Indigenous objects, the communities and people those objects originally came from, and the future of how we remember their stories.


Should these Moccasins also be treated like a Rembrandt Painting? Source.
You see Indigenous objects left the places they originated under many different circumstances and for many different reasons. These objects are taken out of context and physically put behind glass, effectively removing them from history. Freezing them in time, if you will. This physical barrier is erected between object and the people it came from, but another wall is created, and this is not made out of plexiglass. Instead the second obstruction is the Rembrandt Rule. All of sudden that jingle dress that has been in your family for generations or those moccasins that look just like the ones your sister made for you become a museum object. When the object becomes a museum object, the people, heritage, and knowledge it represents can be overlooked in favor of making sure that object survives for future generations. It no longer matters that this rattle was supposed to be heated by the hands of a musician on certain feast days or that blanket was meant to keep children warm on chilly September nights. These museum objects are left there for people to look at, but never to touch, impossible to connect with, and easy to forget.

Jingle dress being danced at a celebration in PEI. Source.


A Jingle dress in the Glenbow Museum. Source. 

I do not mean to be so doom and gloom In this article. In fact, there are many institutions, armed with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission report, that are breaking the Rembrandt Rule. For example, in 2010, five historic Blackfoot hide shirts from the Pitt Rivers Museum came to Alberta. For a brief time, people from Blackfoot communities were able to learn about, visit with, and even try on these pieces of their history.


According to Laura Phillips, “Museums play a critical role in sharing history and providing context and meaning to this history,” but when the object, and by association the history, is frozen in time, what exactly is being shared? Are we not just looking after the physical element of the object and thereby removing it further from the community it whence came? Or, is the Rembrandt Rule just another sacrifice museum professionals have to make to keep their collection healthy, safe, and available for the public? What are your thoughts? I really want to know! Leave a comment, send me an email (allyforand@gmail.com), or if Twitter and Instagram are more your speed my handle on both is @Ally_but_online.

15 April 2019

DECOLONIZING THE MUSEUM: ALUMNI CHECK-IN WITH CAROL PODEDWORNY

Alumni Check-In | Elizabeth Cytko


Carol Podedworny
Photo courtesy of Nadezhda Lyra

Carol Podedworny is the Director and Chief Curator at McMaster Museum of Art. She graduated from the Museum Studies program in 1984 and got a Master of Arts from York University in 1990. She has worked tirelessly to make space for Indigenous voices within museum institutions and to promote critical scholarship for Indigenous art.

What is your favourite memory from your time in the MMSt program?

I would say the internship, we were given the opportunity to do internships at various cultural institutions in the Summer term. I worked for the McMichael Canadian Collection, the AGO, and the ROM.

Internships were an opportunity to have hands-on practical experience of things that we were learning through lectures in the classroom and to tangibly contribute to the work that was being done in cultural organizations. You also had the opportunity to meet colleagues in the field. So for many reasons, it was a really great experience.

Can you tell me about your path to becoming Director and Chief curator of McMaster?

For the most part, after I finished Museum Studies, I worked as a curator. It wasn't until I went to the University of Waterloo in 2006, that I became a Director, actually Director/Curator. I think that's one of the things about our field that needs attention, there isn't a great deal of succession planning. For the most part, many of us who end up as directors actually started our careers as curators.

What do you think could be done in the field to improve succession planning?

I think there could be mentoring opportunities within institutions and that there could be formal training programs provided elsewhere. I know there's an excellent program for training museum directors in the United States, but we don’t have a similar program here. I've been pretty fortunate at McMaster as it has an incredible continuing education program and developing, leading, and managing people is part of that program. At the museum, I look at the senior curator position as an opportunity to mentor that person towards potentially being the next director.

When you graduated from the program, was it a lot of contract work?


No, but I think that is a condition of the year in which I graduated. The amount of competition within the City of Toronto for any kind of employment was pretty high. So I made the decision that I would look beyond the city to find employment. I was subsequently hired as the curator of the Thunder Bay Art Gallery. That was a pretty significant opportunity for me. At the time, the institution was called the Thunder Bay National Exhibition Center and Center for Indian Art. They had within their permanent collection a long term loan from the Canadian Museum of History (which was then called the Canadian Museum of Civilization (CMC)). I didn't just have the opportunity to work in Thunder Bay and work with the collection, but also with the CMC's collection. Thunder Bay was an important move as it offered opportunities to work at the Thunder Bay Art Gallery, with partner institutions across the country, with contemporary First Nations art, and with funding opportunities in the north which rivaled those in the south. Many doors were opened in taking that position in 1984 that have stayed with me for my entire career.

What are some of the greatest risks you have taken in your career?

I think going to Thunder Bay was a risk. I got there in the fall of 1984. I don't know if you have talked about 1988 and the museum community in Canada in your classes, but 1988 was when the Glenbow Spirit Sings controversy occurred – it resulted in a crisis in museum practice internationally such that our work in the community was changed forever. It was a pretty volatile period, it was an exercise in negotiating and I would say it was risky, for sure. On the other hand all these years later, it's actually the reason why I argued for a position for an Indigenous curator in our museum today. When we hired Rhéanne Chartrand, three years ago, there were only three other permanent Indigenous curators in the country: at the AGO, the NGC, and the McKenzie Art Gallery (an arm of the Saskatchewan First Nations University).

By hiring an Indigenous curator has your institution been able to tackle new issues with a new point of view?

What I have found most interesting is not the collecting of Indigenous art nor the exhibition of Indigenous art, but Rhéanne’s commitment to decolonize the institution through day to day practices within the museum. It's a big issue for her, it’s something she came here saying, ‘I need to think about how I place myself in this colonial institution, and within the broader context of McMaster University – also a colonial institution.’ Our curator has put forward a ten page document with supporting documents, such as from the TRC, etc. That change, I would argue, is what's going to change the institution.

Is there one thing you could point to as a big shift in the museum culture and your institution?

I would say decolonization is our current focus and concern. The fact that there is an Indigenous voice in the museum speaking on behalf of Indigenous peoples is important. For Rhéanne, her approach is always informed by her sense of responsibility to her community. I would say this is something that's evolving, we're transitioning to it. I think that it may take years to achieve.

What is one of your failures that was a great learning experience?

I had written an article that was essentially an excerpt of my M.A. thesis, First Nations Art & the Canadian Mainstream, in a Canadian art magazine. I was then invited as a speaker to the National Gallery of Canada’s Land, Spirit, Power symposium documenting the 1992 Columbus Quin-centenary. When you're at university you're able to really examine a topic. As I was examining an early history of exhibitions of Aboriginal art in Canada, I found ample evidence of the exclusion and ghettoizing of Indigenous art, artists, and artistic practices. In my article I had named individuals who had been working at an earlier time and how their practices had caused issues within the representation of First Nations work in the modern art museum. I was shocked and appalled and looking for a reason beyond flat out racism, to explain why Indigenous work in Canada had been dealt with as it had in museums and art museums. Unfortunately, what I took to be “the facts” meant that I named institutions and exhibitions in my talk at the NGC – of course people took exception! If I had that incident to do over today, I would be much more careful about how I said things. I would say that was a failure, on the other hand, naming and calling out, matters. Today more so than ever before.

You have held many leadership roles, what is your advice for being a great leader?

I think it makes a big difference if you encourage the people who are working with you to be the experts in their area, no micro-managing. Also, allowing people to do well and providing opportunities for professional development matters. You want people to be happy in their work. You want everyone to know and be working towards the same goal. I find here at the museum, that everybody knows what we're working towards, and everybody takes particular pride in what their area contributes to the overall goals of the institution.

What advice would you give to museum professionals entering the sector today?


What I have always said, and firmly believe, is that we are working in a huge country with a very tiny cultural community, relatively speaking. I believe that no matter where you are in your career – in school, just finished, in a first job, doing an internship or volunteer work, wherever you are working, whomever you are working with now – you will absolutely run into them again in your future if you continue to work in the cultural community in this country. Find mentors, find people you respect and enjoy and stay connected! You will come across one another again – for sure!


1 April 2019

BUFFING UP ON THE BUFFALO PART 1

Breaking the Glass Case | Alexandra Forand


As the temperature slowly rises and the colours begrudgingly turn from white to brown to green, I find myself exploring outside spaces. For instance, this last weekend, I visited the Toronto Zoo. The Toronto Zoo differs wildly than my own zoo in my hometown, namely in size and the variety of animals on display. What I did not expect to see was a herd of buffalo (people are quick to point out that North American bison are not actually buffalo, but people have been referring to them as buffalo for nearly 200 years). I guess my surprise was buried in the fact that today buffalo are talked about like extinct creatures. After the near extinction of the buffalo in the 19th century, Prairie Peoples were forced to find different mediums for their material culture, but the buffalo still existed in stories, music and dance. I am more familiar with seeing buffalo in museums, either in a diorama or as a medium used in Prairie Peoples' material cultures.

Can you spot the buffalo? Photograph courtesy of Alexandra Forand. 
Before the arrival of the Europeans the buffalo can be seen as a roaming big box super market, where Prairie Peoples could find everything they needed. Horns were fashioned into spoons, cups, headdresses, fire carriers, and ornaments. Prairie Peoples used sinew for thread, dental floss, and bowstrings. Bones were used for arrow shaft, sled runner, knives, shovels, war clubs, scrapers, awls for sewing, game counters, tool handles, ceremonial objects. Cartilage was boiled and used for glue. Teeth were crafted into jewelry and other ornaments. The hooves of the buffalo were used as rattles. The skull of the buffalo was used as an alter in religious ceremonies.



The fur of the buffalo was widely used amongst Prairie Peoples. The extra thick hide on top of the head could be fashioned into a bowl. The pelt was used as walls for tipis, winter clothing, floor covering, hard soles for moccasins, blankets, drums, saddles, masks. Hide was used as clothing, shields, containers, rattles, bedding, mittens, and as a textile to paint, draw, and write on. Tails were used as flyswatters, whips, and ornaments. Hair was woven into ropes, stuffing for pillows, paintbrushes, saddles, shields, halters, ornaments.


Ceremonial headers at the Royal Ontario Museum. Source
The heart was used as a sack to carry dried meat. The stomach was used as a cooking vessel. Bladders were formed into a waterproof pouch, bucket, water vessel. The brain of the buffalo was used in the tanning process of buffalo hide. The scrotum of the male buffalo was used as a rattle in religious ceremonies. Even the excrement of buffalo was used as fuel when firewood was scarce.

Objects made from buffalo are held in museum collections across Canada and abroad. You would be hard pressed to find a collection that has Prairie Peoples' objects, but does not include material culture made from buffalo. This reliance on the buffalo was not purely material, but also became integrated into Prairie Peoples' world views. In a version of the Blackfoot creation story the creator made human beings out of buffalo sinew, bones, and skin.

Buffalo Hide robe. Source

You can also see a western reverence to buffalo. Canada has incorporated buffalo into logos, money, and the buffalo features in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police crest. The symbolic nature of the buffalo almost feels separate from the animal itself. Today, the buffalo hardly exists in the wild, but there are efforts to stabilize their numbers.

Notice the Buffalo? Source.


I’m curious, have you ever seen a buffalo in the wild or in the museum? Was there any object made of buffalo that ever stood out to you? Let me know! Please do not hesitate to contact me at allyforand@gmail.com or if Twitter and Instagram is more your speed my handle on both is @Ally_but_online.


Buffalo will return in the next installation of “Breaking the Glass Case."

13 October 2014

PHOTOGRAPHIC COLLECTIONS - LET'S GET VISUAL

MUSEUM MONDAY
BY ALEXANDRA JEFFERY

New British immigrant to Canada having a bottle of Coca-Cola and a cigarette,
1947, Archives of Ontario (I0002997.jpg)

It's no secret that we are living in a world that is primarily visual; the things that grab our attention are often bright, colourful and loud. Photographic collections have the same impact in archives; they represent some of the most accessible parts of the collections. Archives (and museums) have a really fantastic resource at their finger-tips (in my humble opinion). So, for this Museum Monday, I thought I might post a list of some interesting photograph collections!

1. The City of Toronto Archives has a collection of their favorite photographs, but they also have the photographic collection of Ellis Wiley. This particular collection contains photographs from 1945-1993 of many different areas of Toronto like Kensington and St. Lawrence Market, Ontario Place, the CN Tower…

EDIT: the City of Toronto Archives also has a pretty awesome Flickr page, if you want to see a fair number of photographs without having to search in their database.

St. Lawrence Market, Ellis Wiley fonds (Fonds 124), File 12

Campbell House, Ellis Wiley fonds (Fonds 124), File 2

Ontario Place, Ellis Wiley fonds (Fonds 124), File 9

2. The New York City Department of Records has a collection of Police Department and Criminal Prosecution photographs. The website includes a disclaimer, and I’ll put one here too, be aware that there are photographs that include some graphic images such as homicide crime scene photographs.


Street view, gun in street, political posters in windows, 1916-20 (pde_0127)

George Marthens mugshots #67095, 1916-20 (pde_0390)

Front view of house with door open and footprints in snow, 1916-20 (pde_0187)

3. The McCord Museum has a collection of William Notman photographs. During Notman’s career he “built up the largest photographic business in North America” with 7 permanent studios in Canada at one point or another. Notman's business was held by his family until 1935 when Willam Notman’s son Charles sold the business.



Foot race, Dawson City, about 1900 (MP-0000.2360.36), McCord Museum

Ice shove, Commissioners Street, Montreal, QC about 1884
(VIEW-1498), McCord Museum

Quebec Bridge, Quebec City, QC, 1917(?) (VIEW-6191), McCord Museum

4. The Glenbow Museum has a large photographic collection as well, including photos related to my favorite subject: agricultural labour.


Children picking sugar beets in field, Raymond, Alberta, September 1953
Glenbow Archives (NA-4510-191)

Men model women's clothes in fashion show, Calgary Alberta
Glenbow Archives (NA-5600-7229a)

Threshing crew, Southern Alberta, Glenbow Archives (NA-4548-2)

5. The Toronto Reference Library was just donated a huge collection of photographs (1900-1999) from the Toronto Star. The collection is in the Baldwin Collection of Canadiana. The library has not digitized the collection yet, although I’m not sure if that will even be part of the plan for the collection. However, the Toronto Star did do an online gallery of the highlights of the collection.

Gordie Howe with sons Mark and Marty, February 27, 1976
Toronto Star, Dick Darrell

Queen Elizabeth II with Pierre Trudeau, October 15, 1977
Toronto Star, Jeff Goode

Woman on corner of Bay St. and Front St., March 4, 1985
Toronto Star, Tony Bock